Questions and Answers

Q: What you describe in your book sounds like a left-wing conspiracy to destroy the country's traditions. Is it that organized?

    A: This is not a left wing conspiracy. Most secular elite Smuggers are unconsciously following a strategy that was formulated in the 1930s by an obscure Italian Marxist, Antonino Gramsci. He understood that Marxist ideals would spread more easily if traditional moral values were weakened by attacking the culture and dogmatic communistic ideals were disguised to promote this agenda. Most Smuggers do not even know Gramsci's name yet they understand softer, transforming Marxist ideas are better at destabilizing our traditional culture and fostering a more chaotic modern culture. This marketing approach has been successful in selling failed communist doctrine. The idea of undermining traditional culture took root and blossomed during the counter culture 1960s where many of the present elite was indoctrinated at universities into the belief system that traditional America was and is destructive to its citizens and to other countries throughout the world. These Smuggers are secular Marxist leaning individuals who have infiltrated into every institution in America. They are smug in their attitudes and are mugging us of our moral values. They can be either Republicans or Democrats; the commonality is believing our exceptional culture is exploitive. They are anti-American phonies who believe they are smarter and do not believe the majority should rule. These Smuggers are clever enough to maintain their own power and privilege while redistributing other people's money, This sounds familiar because it is the same practice followed by the Marxist elite bureaucrats in other countries.

Q: When did this culture war over children begin?

    A: This culture war-affecting children began in the 1960s with Dr. Spock promoting Permissive Materialism. By convincing parents to be friends and giving their children whatever they want Dr. Spock was able to undermine our traditional child rearing practices. Dr. Spock was a pediatrician, MD and an admitted socialist. By allowing children to control the family the American culture has been radically changed and weakened.

Q: Are the Smuggers consciously trying to destroy the family or do they simply want a broader definition of "family"?

    A: Smuggers abhor the family and its traditional moral values. They find the family an annoying relic of what they detest about traditional America. Smuggers want the family to be obsolete to increase their power over individuals. They realize the family has historically been the backbone of civilization. By altering the definition of a family, they are able to weaken the fabric of the nation. By redefining the concept of the family these elites will be able to more easily subvert our traditional culture as formulated by Gramsci in the 1930s.

Q: Is this a partisan battle, or one that pits the elites against those they believe are less informed?

    A: This is not a partisan issue because Smuggers exist throughout the political spectrum. They are people who feel they know what is right and have no faith that the American people can make the right decisions. They are in all types of professional positions. These secularists range from Dan Rather, Arlan Spector, corporate CEOs, lawyers, doctors, Ward Churchill, Supreme Court justices and those who believe that power should be consolidated in one world government with them in charge.

Q: What is it about American traditions that angers and, it seems, frightens the Smuggers?

    A: The Smuggers cannot allow Americans to comprehend that the right to govern man is derived not from man but from God. They are frightened by the belief that God exists, evil exists and there is actually right and wrong. Only through moral and cultural relativism can the Smugger elite's Marxist utopian concepts become somewhat credible. The fear of reality shedding it's light and exposing the shallowness and self-serving rhetoric of Smuggers is something they cannot tolerate. What truly angers and frightens them is open and honest debate with moral people that will demonstrate that the foundation of law emanates from God not from government.

Q: Can children grow up well adjusted without religion or a belief in God?

    A: No, children cannot be very well adjusted without having a well-defined concept of right and wrong. Absolute moral values can only come from a belief in a higher power. In the Smugger world the belief system is based on the science of materialism. This does not assist the child in developing a conscience or a direction in developing spirituality.

Q: How does the educational establishment feel about parents?

    A: Parents are an impediment to indoctrinating students into a new world order. The educational establishment appeases rather than confronts parents. Inflating grades and dumbing down standards numb parents into a false sense of security about their child's education. They are neutralized. Through this process Smuggers maintain and increase influence over their children without the interference of the parent's traditional moral values.

Q: Isn't mandatory public education a dubious concept? Government can't fill potholes in time, how can it educate kids?

    A: Government schools are doing a pathetic job of educating children but a credible job of warehousing them. These schools have become so large they are more like a business than an educational environment. The mammoth size of these institutions has increased an economy of scale while making personal relationships between teacher and student almost non-existent. Healthy relationships between teachers and their students are what make for good education. These healthy relationships cannot exist in these factory-like buildings. Too often we see deviant sexual relationships between students and teachers. Without traditional standards of appropriate behavior, without standards to measure students and teachers academically, responsibility and accountability have practically vanished. Discipline, punishment and purpose need to be brought back into the schools to produce viable institutions of education. We need to again revere the American culture of exceptionality.

Q: With no vouchers on the horizon, how does an impoverished parent escape the public school system?

    A: Impoverished parents need to fight for vouchers. It will allow children to go to smaller school where they are treated as individuals rather than as a number and where the school is run by an educator rather than an administrator. Vouchers will make it necessary for government schools to become more accountable and therefore they will improve. Parents need to fight for more manageable sized schools, more discipline, higher standards and more responsive administrators and teachers and stop the acceptance of drugging of our children into submission.

Q: You believe kids beaten by bullies should physically strike back.  That's not something the education establishment will support.

    A: Self- defense has been a traditional concept in America. Everyone has a right not to be violated by another person. By encouraging people to stand up for themselves we eliminate the opportunity for bullies to exist for these individuals are cowards. When people stand up for themselves there are no victims. It is the responsibility of teachers and administrators to investigate each incident and punish children for bullying behavior. By teachers, administrators and students working together control can be re-established in our schools and community. 

Q: You believe that freedom without responsibility attracts evil.  What kind of evil?

    A: Having a totally open society without rules and limits is a welcoming invitation to chaos and anti-social behavior. Freedom without responsibility leads to evil. When a person chooses to do something against the wishes of another not for the good of that person but to satisfy their own personal desires they are committing an evil act. By definition an evil act is a transgression against another person that is harmful to them. Personal responsibility of one's word and deed is necessary to create a moral environment. A moral environment repels evil and attracts goodness. Any person who controls another person for his own self-satisfaction is committing an evil act.

Q: Give me a general rule beating back Smuggers of all kinds?

    A: The Golden Rule: Do Unto Others as You Would Want Them to Do Unto You; will paralyze the Smugger games. Be a role model who lives a disciplined, responsible, moral life. This means have the courage to stand up to anyone trying to control you for his own benefit and rob you of your freedom to have moral values. Be politically incorrect and express your intolerance for inappropriate acts. These are necessary to return to our exceptional American culture.